The Five Points area of Atlanta, 1911 (photo source: georgiainfo.com) |
Atlanta wanted to project itself as being racially tolerant, touting Morris Brown, Atlanta University and Atlanta Baptist as some of the best "black" schools in the nation. Black-owned businesses were also cropping up, lending credence to the idea of a New South.
However, the majority of the city's minority residents, rather than having their own business, worked long hours at menial jobs, doing manual labor, and living in the less-desirable areas of Reynoldstown and Pittsburg.
Five years earlier, in 1906, 40 black men had died as a result of a rampage in which a mob of white men had run rampant through the city after unsubstantiated reports of four white women being assaulted by black men. The tension, and the ugliness of the riot, was still very much alive in Atlanta.
Segregation was law at the time. Blacks could not walk through "white" parks; they could not eat in "white" restaurants; they could not drink in "white" bars; they could not drink from "white" water fountains; and they could not be buried in "white" cemeteries. Accordingly, the city's white residents actively took steps to keep their white-only neighborhoods white. In July of 1911, white residents of Ashby Street held a meeting in which they debated ways to keep blacks out, after four black families had moved in.
And so it wasn't surprising that when the murder spree started, the press and authorities gave it little concern.
(photo source: American Hauntings) |
The Assaults and Murders
It's not possible to say with certainty exactly when the crime spree started and absolutely who the first victim was but on Monday, October 3, 1910, 23-year-old Maggie Brook's body was found at the intersection of the Atlanta and West Point Railroad Track and Hill Street. A cook, Maggie's skull had been fractured.
On Saturday, January 22, 1911, 35-year-old Rosa Trice had the left side of her skull nearly completely crushed, her jaw stabbed and her throat cut so viciously that her head was nearly severed from her neck. After being killed, the perpetrator drug her body some 75 yards from her house on Gardner Street in the Pittsburg neighborhood before abandoning it there, where it was discovered. Two hours after her body was found, her husband was arrested for her murder but released the following night for lack of evidence. The Atlanta Constitution reported her murder, including the grisly details of her killing.
On Sunday morning, May 28, 1911, the body of Mary "Belle" Walker was found just 25 yards from her home on Garibaldi Street. A cook working in a private home on Cooper Street, Belle was found by her sister when she failed to return home from work the night before. Her throat had been cut in a jagged fashion. The Atlanta Constitution duly reported the crime in their May 29 edition on page 7, noting that a "Negro woman" had been killed and there were no clues.
In the early morning of Thursday, June 15, 1911, Addie Watts, a resident of 30 Selman Street, was found in some shrubbery at Krogg and DeKalb Streets, close to the Southern Railway. Authorities believed she had first been hit in the head with a brick or a coupling pin from a train before her killer had stabbed at her skull with a coupling pin and then slit her throat. After she had been killed, she was dragged into the bushes near the tracks.
It was only after Addie Watts was discovered that the local papers began to speculate that there may have been a lone, solitary killer preying on the city's young black women. On June 16, 1911, the day after the Watts killing, The Atlanta Journal ran a headline questioning whether a "black butcher" was at work in the city. It was this brief article (only four paragraphs) that first linked the Atlanta murders to those that occurred in London in the autumn of 1888, where five prostitutes were brutally stabbed to death and mutilated by the infamous Jack the Ripper. According to the article, the police were advancing the theory that "Atlanta has an insane criminal, something on the order of the famed Jack the Ripper." The competing Atlanta Constitution, however, was still holding firm that the killings were isolated, unrelated incidents.
On Saturday, June 24, 1911, Lizzie Watkins, a resident of West Oakland Street, became the next victim. She was found around 11 a.m. the following day at White and Lawson Streets. Like Addie Watts, she was found in a clump of bushes. Also like Addie Watts, Lizzie's throat had been cut and her body had been dragged to where it was found after the fatal injury.
Following the Lizzie Watkins murder, the crimes were (finally) moved to the front page of The Atlanta Journal. The similarities between the victims and murders was pointed out, as was the fact that for five Saturdays in a row, young black or biracial women had been murdered. Through these reports, the public found out for the first time that in each case, it appeared the women were choked into unconsciousness before they were assaulted and killed and that the victims had been mutilated in the same areas of their bodies. Although not specified in the newspaper reports at the time due to the "delicate" nature, like London's Jack the Ripper's victims, Atlanta's Ripper victims were not raped but their injuries appeared sexual in nature. Also like the British Ripper, Atlanta reporters claimed that the local killer had some type of anatomical knowledge.
In the second version, as reported by The Atlanta Journal, Lena and Emma Lou were walking together to the store when the black man, who had been hiding, blocked their path and struck Lena in the head with a brick. Lena fell to the ground and the man began slashing at Emma Lou, never uttering a word. Emma Lou ran from the scene, screaming, but fainted due to blood loss. It was then that the killer cut Lena's throat so severely that her head was nearly severed from her body. He returned to Emma Lou, who had regained consciousness and saw him standing over her with a bloody knife. Only the sound of feet running toward them sent the killer scurrying for cover.
Whichever version was accurate, Lena Sharpe was indeed killed -- and very nearly decapitated -- with her body found by the Seaboard railroad tracks, and Emma Lou Sharpe was stabbed. The Atlanta Journal reported she was unlikely to live but it seems that she did indeed survive her wounds. She also got a good look at the man who stabbed her and quite probably murdered her mother.
The Sharpe assaults and murder prompted The Atlanta Constitution to declare by July 4 that the Jack the Ripper theory had now been given further "substance." The same article also reported that "while the ordinary Negro murder attracts little attention, the police department was . . . expecting a repetition of the long series of crimes which have baffled every effort of the detectives." A $25 reward was offered by undertaker L. L. Lee for the capture of the man who killed Lena Sharpe. Mr. Lee also requested that other black business owners open their wallets to increase the reward fund, making it more enticing and, hopefully, encourage residents to assist the police and bring the guilty party to justice.
Coroner Paul Donehoo stated that the killings were the work of the same man; i.e., a single killer. The city held its breath as another weekend approached; The Atlanta Journal headlined: "Will Jack the Ripper Claim Eighth Victim This Saturday?" An unnamed policeman was quoted as saying the killer would take another victim Saturday before midnight.
The unnamed policeman was right -- and wrong. On Saturday, July 8, 1911, 22-year-old Mary Yeldell left the home of Mr. and Mrs. W. M. Selcer on Fourth Street, where she was employed as a cook. Walking by an alley, she heard a whistle and stopped. A large black man, tall and well built, was moving toward her, as she later said, with a cat-like tread. She screamed and ran back to the Selcer house, where Mr. Selcer grabbed his revolver and headed for the alley. The man, surprisingly, was still there. When Mr. Selcer ordered him to raise his hands or be shot, the man ran down the alley. The police were called but turned up nothing.
If, like Emma Lou Sharpe, Mary Yeldell had come face to face with the Atlanta Ripper, she had been fortunate enough to not only survive but survive without injuries. The Yeldell incident appeared to have broken the Saturday night streak but the Ripper wasn't done yet.
On Tuesday morning, July 11, 1911, a workman by the name of Will Broglin discovered some loose dirt on his normal route to work. Sensing distress, he followed the disturbance to a blood trail in the road at Atlanta Avenue and Martin Street, near the new Orme Street sewer. He found the body of Sadie Holley, who worked at a local laundry, in a small gulley, where it had lain since the previous night. Sadie's skull had been fractured with a large stone, after which she was dragged roughly 15 feet and her throat slashed ear to ear so violently, she was nearly decapitated. Her shoes had been cut from her feet and a comb from her hair was found next to the bloody rock used to bludgeon her. The soft dirt by her body indicated her killer's route of escape.
There was a brief glimmer of hope when 27-year-old laborer Henry Huff was arrested on July 11, less than 24 hours after Sadie Holley's body was found, at his home on Brotherton Street. Huff reportedly had been the last person seen with Holley and possessed trousers with a bloodstain on them, dirt up to the knee and scratches on his arms. A cabman by the name of Will Williams claimed that Huff and Holley had been in his cab, quarreling, before he let them off near where the murder took place. Huff, however, was only held on suspicion.
(photo source: Catlick) |
On Friday, November 10, 1911, Minnie Wise, described by the newspapers as a "comely mulatto girl" was found dead in an alley. She had been bludgeoned with a rock, dragged into a field on Connelly Street, where her throat was cut and then dragged 20 more feet to where she was discovered, near the corner of Georgia Avenue. Her right index finger had been hacked off at the middle joint and her shoes were missing. Minnie was found close to where two other victims had been murdered.
Early Tuesday morning, November 21, 1911, middle-aged Mary Putnam fell prey, being slashed to death. Her body was found around 7 a.m. in a ditch at Stewart Street and University Avenue, buried under some loose dirt. Her throat had been cut, her chest mutilated, and her heart was found lying next to her. Her autopsy would reveal she had also suffered a broken skull. As prints were seen in the dirt around Mary's corpse, police brought a bloodhound in to attempt to track her killer. The dog was able to follow the scent for about 200 yards before losing it. Mary had been a recent Atlanta transplant, having moved to the area to keep house for an elderly black man, who the police did not consider a suspect. More than 1,000 people viewed Mary's body at the undertakers, including Mary's stepson, Walter, who did not identify himself or his stepmother at the time but only after returning to work as an elevator operator, when he informed a passenger. Walter claimed he feared he would be arrested if he had spoken up any earlier. The coroner's inquest into the Putnam case revealed that, as in the Florence case, a firearm had been discharged around midnight.
On Friday, January 19, 1912, Pearl Williams had her throat slashed. She was found the next morning in a vacant lot at Chestnut and West Fair, only a block from her home. Like so many others, Pearl had worked as a cook in a private home.
On Monday, September 8, 1924, The Atlanta Constitution printed "Another Ripper Victim Reported." The unidentified woman had been found on Sunday night on Stewart Avenue near Dill Avenue. The victim, estimated to be around 30 years of age, had a bullet wound to the head, her throat cut, and "terrible" slashes to her wrists and back, and had been dead for roughly 24 hours when she was found.
Eliminations
Although there were clearly many murders from 1910 through 1924, not all of them can conclusively be linked to the Atlanta Ripper. Some that were credited to the elusive killer(s) at the time were likely not his/theirs.
Lucinda McNeal, killed in her home on Friday, February 3, 1911 with a straight razor, was murdered by her husband Charles who, after a night of drinking, had cut her so badly he nearly decapitated her. He was caught immediately following the murder, as not only had witnesses given chase to him but while running from them and two police officers, he ran directly into another officer. Although the McNeal case was open and shut, as she was a black female murdered during the killing period of the Ripper, with her throat cut, she is sometimes mentioned as a potential victim.
In the case of Minnie Wise, murdered in November of 1911, she was married to a man known to be jealous of the attention the attractive Minnie got and had been heard to threaten to kill her. Police suspected that he may have decided to use the unsolved Ripper killings as a cover for his wife's murder.
Pearl Williams had her throat slashed on Friday, January 19, 1912, and her body discovered the following day in the middle of a vacant lot at the corner of Chestnut and West Fair. She had been on her way to her home on West Fair around 7 p.m., a block away from where she was murdered. Pearl had quarreled with a black man in the days before her murder. Presenting himself as an old acquaintance at the home where she worked, he was overheard stating that she had promised to marry him and if she did not, she would not marry anyone. Police arrested Frank Harvey the day after Pearl's murder; he was seen with her prior to her death (it's unknown if he was the man she quarreled with), was in possession of a large knife and had small bloodstains on his shirt. The following day, another suspect was arrested - 17-year-old Edgar Evans, who was picked up on Peters Street. Nothing else is known about Williams' murder or the arrests of Harvey and Evans.
(photo source: JTR Forums) |
The Role of the Media and Race
When the killings commenced in Atlanta, the media was fairly silent on them because the victims weren't white. Even after it was obvious that the city had a killer on its hands, the reports were often buried in the back sections and seemed little more than titillation for the publication's readers. The victims were often described as "negresses," "mulattos," and "octoroons." Even when The Atlanta Journal ran a headline questioning whether there was "a black butcher" in their midst in June of 1911, the article itself was a paltry four paragraphs. Four paragraphs, when some of the city's population was under siege by a human predator or predators.
Racism, sadly, was still alive and well in Atlanta and it was reflected in media's attitude and somewhat ambivalent reporting on the case. Even when the murder of Lena Sharpe and attack on Emma Lou Sharpe was recounted in the press, it was mentioned that "the problem of help is becoming serious." In other words, it wasn't just an emergency that women were being killed; it was also an emergency that the wealthier (i.e., and white) residents of the area were losing their help.
The same article also reported that the "murder of Negroes by Negroes are frequent enough on Saturday nights" when whiskey was flowing freely. And while it is true that copious consumption of alcohol can certainly lead to altercations, the reporting made it appear that these kinds of crimes, in the poorer areas, was to be expected.
In July of 1911, following the murder of Mary Yeldell, it was the black churches that put together a reward for information on the killer. It was also the black community that demanded that the Atlanta Police Department find black detectives to solve the case, whether it be because they felt the white officers were not giving a hundred percent because the victims were black or because they felt black detectives might winnow out more information in the black community.
Despite the black community requesting the local police to assign black detectives to the case, there was outrage that only black men had been arrested for the murders. There were accusations that these arrests reeked of racism; surely, white men were capable of murder, too.
However, in looking at the facts and considering the era in which these murders took place, the Atlanta Ripper was almost certainly a black male - and there was more than one killer. Even when not considering Emma Lou Sharpe's description of the man who stabbed her and most certainly killed her mother, it would have been difficult for a white man to move so freely and relatively unnoticed through black neighborhoods. Once the killings started, any unknown person, and especially a Caucasian, would have been met with wary glances or outright defense. Since the Ripper was able to continue to kill undetected, even after the city was on alert, he was almost definitely a black man.
The location of the bodies, nearly always found by a railroad track or something to do with the railroad, had to have meaning. It's possible that the Ripper worked for the railroad and didn't stray far from the area he was familiar with. As the trains would run in and out of Atlanta, usually on the weekends, it's also possible that the Ripper was not an Atlanta resident at all but simply came into town with the train. His schedule may have changed, which resulted in the murders going from Saturday nights to the beginning of the week.
Almost certainly the Atlanta Ripper's motive is much the same as England's Jack the Ripper: a deep and abiding hatred, and possibly fear, of women. Black women could have been chosen simply because they were easier for him to approach, due to segregation at the time. As many of them were also biracial, he could also have had a prejudice and hatred toward them.
The police were in a no-win situation. Oftentimes they arrived at the crime scene, or body dump site, after dozens of others had trudged through the area to view the body, potentially moving or destroying evidence. With each subsequent murder, patrols were beefed up but since the Ripper seemingly had no particular pattern for how he chose his victims and then struck, the PD was at a serious disadvantage. When they did make an arrest, they were met with criticism and accused of making those arrests because they were racist. Even the Atlanta Constitution, which had devoted little space in reporting the crimes, chastised the police department for its inability to solve the very crimes they seemed reluctant to give wide berth to. Atlanta's mayor also got into the act, throwing shade on the police by claiming he couldn't understand why they were "unable to cope with the situation." It seems like the anger that should have been directed at the killer was instead projected to the police department.
(photo source: American Hauntings) |